As we all know that houses and lands are all real estates but I'm writing to ask you guys which one is more lucrative than the other, I believe one of them might be lucrative that the other, for me I think buying lands is lucrative my reason is because lands are more expensive than houses
Selling of houses or selling of land are both competitive business. This is as a result of the money that Comes from it.
Selling of land is quit simple, as the land is mare plan without any physical made structure. When a land is located in urban areas where develop is on a rapid rate, the price becomes higher compare to rural land.
And when you say selling of houses, I assume you mean like going into real estate. Where houses are auction out for sells by the owner, who are seeking prospective buyers. It is also a nice way of making money. Although the location matter just the land location and features matters.
That's the two distinction between the both of them but for me I ty lands are more lucrative than buying houses but I will like to hear your opinions on this .
Selling of houses or selling of land are both competitive business. This is as a result of the money that Comes from it.
Selling of land is quit simple, as the land is mare plan without any physical made structure. When a land is located in urban areas where develop is on a rapid rate, the price becomes higher compare to rural land.
And when you say selling of houses, I assume you mean like going into real estate. Where houses are auction out for sells by the owner, who are seeking prospective buyers. It is also a nice way of making money. Although the location matter just the land location and features matters.
That's the two distinction between the both of them but for me I ty lands are more lucrative than buying houses but I will like to hear your opinions on this .