hocksenzyme
New member
Technology has been programmed to take over the monotony of workplace redundancy and alleviate the physical assault of backbreaking labor. Think about it, a human authors a string of digital code that manipulates a foreign machine. An army of machines submit to the whims of a programmer, who translates ideas into instructional data, and kinetic movement is injected into the foreign machine. Innovations in technology have transformed our lives in every conceivable way, and yet some industries stubbornly shun the efficiency of machines for the vulnerable inefficiency of humans.
Sure, humans need to work, and to speak in favor of automation is to take cheap shots against human laborers. So, let's agree to temporarily step into a fantasy world where people weren't so voluntarily hypersensitive to things that aren't even insulting, and have a quick conversation about the topic of technology and efficiency.
First, if technology can offer perfection and resiliency to laborious and redundant tasks, how does one argue against it? If artificial intelligence and machine learning can perfect complicated calculation and scan millions of pages in an instant and act upon preprogrammed triggers that are part of its instructional code, what logical reason would a company have for ignoring this next-generation solution?
Public relations is one of those industries where executives are afraid of mechanical efficiency because it will immediately shine a light on their rampant vulnerabilities, inconsistencies, and pathological shortcomings. Artificial intelligence offers the client exponentially more resilient returns than those of a three-dimensional zombie in a suit. AI works 24/7/365 and doesn't take a vacation day, a sick day, or even an emotional recuperation day. The client receives the potency and resiliency of an inexhaustible machine that is programmed to do one thing and one thing only, offer the client continuous wins; day in day out.
Sure, humans need to work, and to speak in favor of automation is to take cheap shots against human laborers. So, let's agree to temporarily step into a fantasy world where people weren't so voluntarily hypersensitive to things that aren't even insulting, and have a quick conversation about the topic of technology and efficiency.
First, if technology can offer perfection and resiliency to laborious and redundant tasks, how does one argue against it? If artificial intelligence and machine learning can perfect complicated calculation and scan millions of pages in an instant and act upon preprogrammed triggers that are part of its instructional code, what logical reason would a company have for ignoring this next-generation solution?
Public relations is one of those industries where executives are afraid of mechanical efficiency because it will immediately shine a light on their rampant vulnerabilities, inconsistencies, and pathological shortcomings. Artificial intelligence offers the client exponentially more resilient returns than those of a three-dimensional zombie in a suit. AI works 24/7/365 and doesn't take a vacation day, a sick day, or even an emotional recuperation day. The client receives the potency and resiliency of an inexhaustible machine that is programmed to do one thing and one thing only, offer the client continuous wins; day in day out.
